Appendices

 

Home
Introduction
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
References
Appendices
Curriculum Vitae

APPENDIX A

 

LETTER TO REGIONAL DIRECTOR

ASKING PERMISSION TO CONDUCT STUDY

 

                                                                                    May 26, 2005

 

Diamar P. Kadon, Ed.D, CESO III, Director IV

Director IV

DepED Region XI

Davao City

 

Sir:

 

            The undersigned is conducting a study on the “Teachers Characteristics and Level of Activism of the Department of Education Teachers in Region XI: Basis for Educational Policy Formulation.” As a partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Doctor of Education in Management and Planning.

 

            With regards to this, the undersigned is asking permission to conduct the said research in Region XI in the following divisions: Davao City, Tagum City, Pnanbo City, Digos City, and IGaCoS. She further request to access to pertinent records for the needed data relative to her study. Rest assured that all information gathered would be keep strictly confidential.

 

            She believes that result of this study will be significant to administrators, education managers, and education executives for their effective management of the schools and in the formulation of educational policies.

 

            She requests further that she be allowed to distribute the questionnaires to the teachers both in elementary and secondary levels.

 

            She will be grateful for the positive and favorable action regarding her request.

 

 

                                                                        (SGD) JELIETA MARIVELES-RUCA

                                                                                                Researcher

 

Approved:

 

(SGD) DIAMAR P. KADON CESO III, DIRECTOR IV

DepEd Region XI

 

  

APPENDIX B

 

LETTER TO THE JURY OF EXPERTS

FOR CONTENT VALIDATION

 

                                                                                    September 3, 2005

 

___________________________

___________________________

___________________________

 

 

 

Madam:

As per agreement during the outline defense of the undersigned, panel members will evaluate and validate her instrument before it will be administered to the respondents of the study.

In this regard, the researcher submits her instrument for your scrutiny, comments and suggestions.

The undersigned appreciates it very much if you can return the instrument the soonest possible time.

Thank you very much and more power.

 

                                                                                                   Sincerely yours,

(SGD) JELIETA MARIVELES-RUCA

    Researcher

                                                                                            

Contents Noted:

 

 

(SGD) SUSAN F. LABUTAP Ed.D

                   Adviser

 

 

 

APPENDIX C

Consolidated Result for Content Validation

 

Content

Jury of Experts

Total

A

B

C

D

1. Clarity of Language

    The vocabulary level, language structure and conceptual level of the questions suit the level of respondents. The items are written in clear and understandable manner.

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

 

5

 

 

  5

2. Presentation/Organization of Topics

    The items presented are organized in logical manner.

 

5

 

4

 

4

 

4

  

  4.5

3. Suitability of Items

    The items appropriately represent the substance of the research. The instrument is designed to determine the condition, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes that are supposed to be measured.

 

 

4

 

 

5

 

 

4

 

 

4

 

 

  4.25

4. Adequacy of Purpose              

    The items represent the coverage of the research adequately. The number of instrument per area is representative enough of all the questions needed for the research.

 

 

5

 

 

5

 

 

4

 

 

4

 

 

  4.5

5. Attainment of Purpose

    The instrument as a whole fulfills the objectives for which it will be constructed.

 

5

 

 

4

 

4

 

5

 

  4.5

6. Respondents-Friendliness

    The instrument creates a positive impression, one that motivates respondents to answer.

 

5

 

5

 

4

 

5

 

  4.75

7. Objectivity

    No aspect of the instrument suggests bias on the part of the research.

 

4

 

5

 

4

 

4

 

   4.525

 

Legend:

 

A – Dr. Daleon                                  (SGD) SIXTO O. DALEON, Ed.D

B – Dr. Garcia                                   (SGD) ROSARIO P. GARCIA Ed.d

C – Dr. Gargar                                  (SGD) FELOMINO A. GARGAR

D – Dr. Abellanosa                           (SGD) GAUDENCIO G. ABELLANOSA Ed.D

 

Point Equivalent:

 

5 – excellent     4 – very good   3 – good          2 – fair 1 – poor

 

 

APPENDIX D

 

VALIDATION SHEET

 

Name:                                Gaudencio G. Abellanosa Ed.D

Highest Degree Earned:  Doctor of Education

 

Point Equivalent:

5 – excellent               4 – very good 3 – good         2 – fair            1 - poor

 

Content

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 4

 3

 2

 1

1. Clarity of Language

    The vocabulary level, language structure and conceptual level of the questions suit the level of respondents. The items are written in clear and understandable manner.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Presentation/Organization of Topics

    The items presented are organized in logical manner.

 

 

 

 

3. Suitability of Items

    The items appropriately represent the substance of the research. The instrument is designed to determine the condition, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes that are supposed to be measured.

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Adequacy of Purpose              

    The items represent the coverage of the research adequately. The number of instrument per area is representative enough of all the questions needed for the research.

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. Attainment of Purpose

    The instrument as a whole fulfills the objectives for which it will be constructed.

 

 

 

 

 

6. Respondents-Friendliness

    The instrument creates a positive impression, one that motivates respondents to answer.

 

 

 

 

 

7. Objectivity

    No aspect of the instrument suggests bias on the part of the research.

 

 

 

 

 

               

 

                                                                                       Evaluated by:

 

(SGD) GAUDENCIO G. ABELLANOSA Ed.D

 

Name:                                FELOMINO A. GARGAR Ed.D

Highest Degree Earned:  Doctor of Education

 

Point Equivalent:

5 – excellent               4 – very good 3 – good         2 – fair            1 - poor

 

Content

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 4

 3

 2

 1

1. Clarity of Language

    The vocabulary level, language structure and conceptual level of the questions suit the level of respondents. The items are written in clear and understandable manner.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Presentation/Organization of Topics

    The items presented are organized in logical manner.

 

 

 

 

 

3. Suitability of Items

    The items appropriately represent the substance of the research. The instrument is designed to determine the condition, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes that are supposed to be measured.

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Adequacy of Purpose              

    The items represent the coverage of the research adequately. The number of instrument per area is representative enough of all the questions needed for the research.

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. Attainment of Purpose

    The instrument as a whole fulfills the objectives for which it will be constructed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. Respondents-Friendliness

    The instrument creates a positive impression, one that motivates respondents to answer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. Objectivity

    No aspect of the instrument suggests bias on the part of the research.

 

 

 

 

 

 

             

 

                                                                                       Evaluated by:

 

(SGD) FELOMINO A. GARGAR Ed.D

 

 

Name:                                SIXTO O. DALEON Ed.D

Highest Degree Earned:  Doctor of Education & Doctor of Philosophy

 

Point Equivalent:

5 – excellent               4 – very good 3 – good         2 – fair            1 - poor

 

Content

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 4

 3

 2

 1

1. Clarity of Language

    The vocabulary level, language structure and conceptual level of the questions suit the level of respondents. The items are written in clear and understandable manner.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Presentation/Organization of Topics

    The items presented are organized in logical manner.

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Suitability of Items

    The items appropriately represent the substance of the research. The instrument is designed to determine the condition, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes that are supposed to be measured.

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Adequacy of Purpose              

    The items represent the coverage of the research adequately. The number of instrument per area is representative enough of all the questions needed for the research.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. Attainment of Purpose

    The instrument as a whole fulfills the objectives for which it will be constructed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. Respondents-Friendliness

    The instrument creates a positive impression, one that motivates respondents to answer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. Objectivity

    No aspect of the instrument suggests bias on the part of the research.

 

 

 

 

 

 

             

 

                                                                                       Evaluated by:

 

(SGD) SIXTO O. DALEON Ed.D

 

Name:                                ROSARIO  GARCIA Ed.D

Highest Degree Earned:  Doctor of Education

 

Point Equivalent:

5 – excellent               4 – very good 3 – good         2 – fair            1 - poor

 

Content

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 4

 3

 2

 1

1. Clarity of Language

    The vocabulary level, language structure and conceptual level of the questions suit the level of respondents. The items are written in clear and understandable manner.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Presentation/Organization of Topics

    The items presented are organized in logical manner.

 

 

 

 

 

3. Suitability of Items

    The items appropriately represent the substance of the research. The instrument is designed to determine the condition, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes that are supposed to be measured.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Adequacy of Purpose              

    The items represent the coverage of the research adequately. The number of instrument per area is representative enough of all the questions needed for the research.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. Attainment of Purpose

    The instrument as a whole fulfills the objectives for which it will be constructed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. Respondents-Friendliness

    The instrument creates a positive impression, one that motivates respondents to answer.

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. Objectivity

    No aspect of the instrument suggests bias on the part of the research.

 

 

 

 

 

 

             

 

                                                                                       Evaluated by:

 

(SGD) ROSARIO GARCIA Ed.D

 

  

APPENDIX E

Questionnaire A

TEACHERS CHARACTERISTICS

Name:  (optional)__________________________________

Directions: Please check the space that is most appropriate rating on the item about your characteristics. Indicate your reactions as follows:

 

5 – Strongly Agree     - if you have always manifest at all times such

                                         characteristic/behavior

4 – Agree                    - if you have often manifest such characteristic but not

                                          all times

3 – Moderately Agree- if you have manifest such characteristic every now

                                        and then

2 – Disagree                - if you have manifest such characteristic once in a

                                        while

1 - Strongly Disagree - if you never or almost never manifest such characteristic

 

ITEMS

POINTS

A.  Sociability

5 4 3 2

1

 

1.  I can readily establish intimate rapport with others.

 

 

 

 

 

2. I can mix easily in social situations.

 

 

 

 

 

3. I am comfortable in situations that call for closeness with other

    people.

 

 

 

 

 

4. I have warm and comforting relationship with people.

 

 

 

 

 

5. I tend to have more interest in people.

 

 

 

 

 

B.  Emotional Control

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. I maintain appropriate emotional control.

 

 

 

 

 

2. I am less impulsive and tend to have more self-control over things.

 

 

 

 

 

3. I am calm in under pressure and stressful situation.

 

 

 

 

 

4. I am good and remaining calm and optimistic during difficulties.

 

 

 

 

 

5. I find it easy to regain my composure after something has upset me.

 

 

 

 

 

C.  Dominance

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.  I tend to be forceful and vocal in expressing my wishes and

     opinions.

 

 

 

 

 

2. I tend to be pushy about obtaining what I want.

 

 

 

 

 

3. I try to control other’s behavior.

 

 

 

 

 

4. I feel comfortable giving people directions.

 

 

 

 

 

5. I have trouble just letting things go.

 

 

 

 

 

D.  Warmth

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. I like almost everyone I meet.

 

 

 

 

 

2. I can easily engage others in conversation.

 

 

 

 

 

3. I tend to be enthusiastic and spontaneous in my relationships.

 

 

 

 

 

4. I am lively and drawn to stimulating situations.

 

 

 

 

 

5. I enjoy people who show their emotions openly.

 

 

 

 

 

E.  Empathy

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. I am sensitive to other people’s emotions and feelings.

 

 

 

 

 

2. I am able to understand other people’s perspective.

 

 

 

 

 

3. I am considerate and supportive to others.

 

 

 

 

 

4. I apologize when I made a mistake.

 

 

 

 

 

5. I listen to what others have to say.

 

 

 

 

 

F. Agreeableness

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. I don’t exert my will over others.

 

 

 

 

 

2. I set aside my wishes and feelings to give way to others.

 

 

 

 

 

3. I don’t argue my views and opinions.

 

 

 

 

 

4. I hold back if suspect people wont like what I have to say.

 

 

 

 

 

5. I am more cooperative than assertive.

 

 

 

 

 

             

 

APPENDIX F

Questionnaire B

LEVEL OF ACTIVISM

Below are the items used with its corresponding points in analyzing the level of activism of Department of Education teachers in Region XI. Please check the space that is most appropriate rating on the item about your level of activism. Indicate your reactions as follows

 

5 – Strongly Agree     - if you have always manifest at all times such

                                        characteristic/behavior

4 – Agree                   - if you have often manifest such characteristic but not

                                       all times

3 – Moderately Agree- if you have manifest such characteristic every now

                                     and then

2 – Disagree               - if you have manifest such characteristic once in a

                                     while

1 – Strongly Disagree- if you never or almost never manifest such characteristic

 

Items

Points

A. Activism on Philosophical Issues

 

1. I believe that teachers must exercise their rights to self-organization and just humane working condition.

5 4 3 2

1

2.  I discharge my responsibilities in accordance    with the organization’s philosophy/vision, mission, and goals.

         

3.  I believe that teachers have a role in the promotion of nationalist, scientific, and mass-oriented education.

       

 

4.  I am interested in fighting teacher’s rights and welfare

       

 

5.  I believe that teachers are the best agent for change

       

 

6.      I believe that teachers play a vital role for the transformation of the society.

       

 

7.      I believe that teachers must actively defend their rights by monitoring politically repressive educational policies.

       

 

8.      I encourage my co-teachers to freely express their conditions and situations.

       

 

B. Activism on Political Issues

1.      I am proud to be a member of teachers’ organization and or association.

       

 

2. I join the collective discussion on problems that may arise in the teaching profession.

       

 

3.      I cooperate in the activities of teacher’s organizations and associations.

       

 

4.      I maintain harmonious relationship with members of teacher’s organizations.

       

 

  1. I attend in the teachers’ organizational meetings and conferences aimed to discuss political issues.
       

 

  1. I join trainings that will uplift the level of consciousness and awareness of teachers.
       

 

  1. I abide the rules and regulations governing teachers.
       

 

  1. I join activities that will assert teacher’s political rights.
       

 

C. Activism on Economic Issues

  1. I participate to lobby the Issue on salary increase of teachers.
       

 

  1. I join rallies aimed to voice out teachers’ demands on increase of benefits and allowances.
       

 

3.      I fight for the constitutional   mandate that education sector must be given priority budget in the National Government

       

 

4.      I support through my presence to any hearing in the local government to solve the economic condition of the education sector. 

       

 

5.      I join in any form of struggle to solve the education sector’s problem such as lack of school facilities, classrooms etc.

       

 

6.      I help launch economic related projects such as cooperativism to end up poverty among teachers.

       

 

7.      I sign up manifesto against economically repressive issues such us oil deregulation law and etc.

       

 

D. Activism on Socio-cultural Issues

1.       I integrate in my daily lesson the issues concerning women and gender etc.

       

 

2.       I integrate in my daily lesson the issue concerning the fight of the Indigenous People for ancestral domain

       

 

3.       I help to increase the level of awareness of the children for their rights and welfare

       

 

4.  I participate in the promotion of programs, which will uplift and preserve Filipino values and indigenous culture particularly in Mindanao.

       

 

5. I participate in a community exposure/immersion to deepen my understanding on cultural diversities.

-------------------------------------------------- Paid Advertisement Links Below --------------------------------------------------
Checks By Phone | Verify a Check | Reorder Checks | Routing Number | Check Verification
| BIN Database |
| Recycle Food Waste Boston | Check By Phone Software Reviews | Short Term Furnished Allston | SWIFT Code Database |