|
APPENDIX A
LETTER TO REGIONAL
DIRECTOR
ASKING PERMISSION
TO CONDUCT STUDY
May 26, 2005
Diamar P. Kadon, Ed.D, CESO III,
Director IV
Director IV
DepED Region XI
Davao City
Sir:
The undersigned is
conducting a study on the “Teachers Characteristics and Level of Activism of the
Department of Education Teachers in Region XI: Basis for Educational Policy
Formulation.” As a partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Doctor
of Education in Management and Planning.
With regards to
this, the undersigned is asking permission to conduct the said research in
Region XI in the following divisions: Davao City, Tagum City, Pnanbo City, Digos
City, and IGaCoS. She further request to access to pertinent records for the
needed data relative to her study. Rest assured that all information gathered
would be keep strictly confidential.
She believes that
result of this study will be significant to administrators, education managers,
and education executives for their effective management of the schools and in
the formulation of educational policies.
She requests further
that she be allowed to distribute the questionnaires to the teachers both in
elementary and secondary levels.
She will be grateful
for the positive and favorable action regarding her request.
(SGD)
JELIETA MARIVELES-RUCA
Researcher
Approved:
(SGD) DIAMAR P. KADON CESO
III, DIRECTOR IV
DepEd Region XI
APPENDIX B
LETTER TO THE JURY
OF EXPERTS
FOR CONTENT
VALIDATION
September 3, 2005
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
Madam:
As per
agreement during the outline defense of the undersigned, panel members will
evaluate and validate her instrument before it will be administered to the
respondents of the study.
In this
regard, the researcher submits her instrument for your scrutiny, comments and
suggestions.
The
undersigned appreciates it very much if you can return the instrument the
soonest possible time.
Thank you
very much and more power.
Sincerely yours,
(SGD) JELIETA MARIVELES-RUCA
Researcher
Contents Noted:
(SGD) SUSAN F. LABUTAP Ed.D
Adviser
APPENDIX C
Consolidated
Result for Content Validation
Content
|
Jury of
Experts |
Total |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|
1. Clarity of Language
The vocabulary level,
language structure and conceptual level of the questions suit the level of
respondents. The items are written in clear and understandable manner. |
5
|
5
|
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
2.
Presentation/Organization of Topics
The items presented are
organized in logical manner. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4.5 |
|
3. Suitability of Items
The items appropriately
represent the substance of the research. The instrument is designed to
determine the condition, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured. |
4 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4.25 |
|
4. Adequacy of
Purpose
The items represent the
coverage of the research adequately. The number of instrument per area is
representative enough of all the questions needed for the research. |
5 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4.5 |
|
5. Attainment of Purpose
The instrument as a
whole fulfills the objectives for which it will be constructed. |
5
|
4 |
4 |
5 |
4.5 |
|
6.
Respondents-Friendliness
The instrument creates a
positive impression, one that motivates respondents to answer. |
5 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
4.75 |
|
7. Objectivity
No aspect of the
instrument suggests bias on the part of the research. |
4 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4.525 |
Legend:
A – Dr. Daleon (SGD) SIXTO
O. DALEON, Ed.D
B – Dr. Garcia (SGD)
ROSARIO P. GARCIA Ed.d
C – Dr. Gargar (SGD)
FELOMINO A. GARGAR
D – Dr. Abellanosa (SGD)
GAUDENCIO G. ABELLANOSA Ed.D
Point Equivalent:
5 –
excellent 4 – very good 3 – good 2 – fair 1 – poor
APPENDIX D
VALIDATION SHEET
Name: Gaudencio G.
Abellanosa Ed.D
Highest Degree Earned: Doctor
of Education
Point Equivalent:
5 – excellent 4 –
very good 3 – good 2 – fair 1 - poor
Content
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
1. Clarity of Language
The vocabulary level,
language structure and conceptual level of the questions suit the level of
respondents. The items are written in clear and understandable manner. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Presentation/Organization of Topics
The items presented are
organized in logical manner. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Suitability of Items
The items appropriately
represent the substance of the research. The instrument is designed to
determine the condition, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
4. Adequacy of
Purpose
The items represent the
coverage of the research adequately. The number of instrument per area is
representative enough of all the questions needed for the research. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
5. Attainment of Purpose
The instrument as a
whole fulfills the objectives for which it will be constructed. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Respondents-Friendliness
The instrument creates a
positive impression, one that motivates respondents to answer. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
7. Objectivity
No aspect of the
instrument suggests bias on the part of the research. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated by:
(SGD)
GAUDENCIO G. ABELLANOSA Ed.D
Name: FELOMINO A. GARGAR
Ed.D
Highest Degree Earned: Doctor
of Education
Point Equivalent:
5 – excellent 4 –
very good 3 – good 2 – fair 1 - poor
Content
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
1. Clarity of Language
The vocabulary level,
language structure and conceptual level of the questions suit the level of
respondents. The items are written in clear and understandable manner. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Presentation/Organization of Topics
The items presented are
organized in logical manner. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
3. Suitability of Items
The items appropriately
represent the substance of the research. The instrument is designed to
determine the condition, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
4. Adequacy of
Purpose
The items represent the
coverage of the research adequately. The number of instrument per area is
representative enough of all the questions needed for the research. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
5. Attainment of Purpose
The instrument as a
whole fulfills the objectives for which it will be constructed. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
6.
Respondents-Friendliness
The instrument creates a
positive impression, one that motivates respondents to answer. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
7. Objectivity
No aspect of the
instrument suggests bias on the part of the research. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated by:
(SGD)
FELOMINO A. GARGAR Ed.D
Name: SIXTO O. DALEON Ed.D
Highest Degree Earned: Doctor
of Education & Doctor of Philosophy
Point Equivalent:
5 – excellent 4 –
very good 3 – good 2 – fair 1 - poor
Content
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
1. Clarity of Language
The vocabulary level,
language structure and conceptual level of the questions suit the level of
respondents. The items are written in clear and understandable manner. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Presentation/Organization of Topics
The items presented are
organized in logical manner. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Suitability of Items
The items appropriately
represent the substance of the research. The instrument is designed to
determine the condition, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
4. Adequacy of
Purpose
The items represent the
coverage of the research adequately. The number of instrument per area is
representative enough of all the questions needed for the research. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Attainment of Purpose
The instrument as a
whole fulfills the objectives for which it will be constructed. |
√
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Respondents-Friendliness
The instrument creates a
positive impression, one that motivates respondents to answer. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
7. Objectivity
No aspect of the
instrument suggests bias on the part of the research. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated by:
(SGD) SIXTO O. DALEON Ed.D
Name: ROSARIO GARCIA Ed.D
Highest Degree Earned: Doctor
of Education
Point Equivalent:
5 – excellent 4 –
very good 3 – good 2 – fair 1 - poor
Content
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
1. Clarity of Language
The vocabulary level,
language structure and conceptual level of the questions suit the level of
respondents. The items are written in clear and understandable manner. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Presentation/Organization of Topics
The items presented are
organized in logical manner. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
3. Suitability of Items
The items appropriately
represent the substance of the research. The instrument is designed to
determine the condition, knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes that are
supposed to be measured. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Adequacy of
Purpose
The items represent the
coverage of the research adequately. The number of instrument per area is
representative enough of all the questions needed for the research. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Attainment of Purpose
The instrument as a
whole fulfills the objectives for which it will be constructed. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Respondents-Friendliness
The instrument creates a
positive impression, one that motivates respondents to answer. |
|
√ |
|
|
|
|
7. Objectivity
No aspect of the
instrument suggests bias on the part of the research. |
√ |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated by:
(SGD) ROSARIO GARCIA Ed.D
APPENDIX E
Questionnaire A
TEACHERS CHARACTERISTICS
Name: (optional)__________________________________
Directions: Please check the space that is most
appropriate rating on the item about your characteristics. Indicate your
reactions as follows:
5 – Strongly Agree - if you have always
manifest at all times such
characteristic/behavior
4 – Agree - if you have often
manifest such characteristic but not
all
times
3 – Moderately Agree- if you have manifest such
characteristic every now
and then
2 – Disagree - if you have
manifest such characteristic once in a
while
1 - Strongly Disagree - if you never or almost never
manifest such characteristic
|
ITEMS |
POINTS |
|
A. Sociability |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
1. I can readily establish intimate rapport with
others. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. I can mix easily in social situations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. I am comfortable in situations that call for
closeness with other
people. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. I have warm and comforting relationship with people. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. I tend to have more interest in people. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Emotional Control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. I maintain appropriate emotional control. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. I am less impulsive and tend to have more
self-control over things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. I am calm in under pressure and stressful situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. I am good and remaining calm and optimistic during
difficulties. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. I find it easy to regain my composure after
something has upset me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Dominance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. I tend to be forceful and vocal in expressing my
wishes and
opinions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. I tend to be pushy about obtaining what I want. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. I try to control other’s behavior. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. I feel comfortable giving people directions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. I have trouble just letting things go. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Warmth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. I like almost everyone I meet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. I can easily engage others in conversation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. I tend to be enthusiastic and spontaneous in my
relationships. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. I am lively and drawn to stimulating situations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. I enjoy people who show their emotions openly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Empathy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. I am sensitive to other people’s emotions and
feelings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. I am able to understand other people’s perspective. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. I am considerate and supportive to others. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. I apologize when I made a mistake. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. I listen to what others have to say. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Agreeableness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. I don’t exert my will over others. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. I set aside my wishes and feelings to give way to
others. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. I don’t argue my views and opinions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. I hold back if suspect people wont like what I have
to say. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. I am more cooperative than assertive. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPENDIX F
Questionnaire B
LEVEL OF ACTIVISM
Below are the items used with its corresponding
points in analyzing the level of activism of Department of Education teachers in
Region XI. Please check the space that is most appropriate rating on the item
about your level of activism. Indicate your reactions as follows
5 – Strongly Agree - if you have always
manifest at all times such
characteristic/behavior
4 – Agree - if you have often
manifest such characteristic but not
all times
3 – Moderately Agree- if you have manifest such
characteristic every now
and then
2 – Disagree - if you have manifest
such characteristic once in a
while
1 – Strongly Disagree- if you never or almost
never manifest such characteristic
|
Items |
Points |
|
A. Activism on Philosophical Issues
1. I believe that teachers must exercise their rights to self-organization
and just humane working condition. |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
2. I discharge my responsibilities in accordance with the organization’s
philosophy/vision, mission, and goals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. I believe that teachers have a role in the promotion of nationalist,
scientific, and mass-oriented education. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. I am interested in fighting teacher’s
rights and welfare |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. I believe that teachers are the best agent for change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
I believe that teachers play a
vital role for the transformation of the society. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
I believe that teachers must
actively defend their rights by monitoring politically repressive
educational policies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
I encourage my co-teachers to
freely express their conditions and situations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Activism on Political Issues
1.
I am proud to be a member
of teachers’ organization and or association. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. I join the collective discussion on problems that may arise in the
teaching profession. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
I cooperate in the activities
of teacher’s organizations and associations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
I maintain harmonious
relationship with members of teacher’s organizations. |
|
|
|
|
|
- I attend in the
teachers’ organizational meetings and conferences aimed to discuss
political issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- I join trainings that
will uplift the level of consciousness and awareness of teachers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- I abide the rules and
regulations governing teachers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- I join activities that
will assert teacher’s political rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Activism on
Economic Issues
- I participate to lobby
the Issue on salary increase of teachers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- I join rallies aimed to
voice out teachers’ demands on increase of benefits and allowances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
I fight for the constitutional mandate that education sector must
be given priority budget in the National Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. I
support through my presence to any hearing in the local government to solve
the economic condition of the education sector. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. I join
in any form of struggle to solve the education sector’s problem such as lack
of school facilities, classrooms etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. I help
launch economic related projects such as cooperativism to end up poverty
among teachers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. I sign
up manifesto against economically repressive issues such us oil deregulation
law and etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
D. Activism on Socio-cultural Issues
1.
I integrate in my daily lesson the issues
concerning women and gender etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
I integrate in my daily lesson the issue concerning the fight of the
Indigenous People for ancestral domain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. I help
to increase the level of awareness of the children for their rights and
welfare |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. I participate in the promotion of programs, which will uplift and
preserve Filipino values and indigenous culture particularly in Mindanao. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. I participate in a community exposure/immersion to deepen my
understanding on cultural diversities. |
--------------------------------------------------
Paid Advertisement Links Below
--------------------------------------------------
Checks
By Phone | Verify a Check |
Reorder Checks |
Routing Number |
Check Verification
| BIN Database |
| Recycle Food Waste Boston |
Check By Phone Software
Reviews | Short Term Furnished Allston |
SWIFT Code Database |
| |